As the 2024-2025 basketball season unfolds, Beaver Dam and Round Mountain have proven to be formidable forces in their respective regions, boasting distinct strengths and weaknesses. A closer look at their records, statistical breakdowns, and head-to-head performances reveals valuable insights for fans and analysts alike.

Team Overview:

Beaver Dam (AZ) has an overall record of 11-12, with a regional standing of 4-2. Their performance at home (5-5) and away (5-3) shows some inconsistency, and they have struggled with a neutral court record of 1-4. With an average of 35.8 points per game, Beaver Dam’s scoring has been modest, with noticeable gaps in their second-half performances, where they average only 7.0 points between the third and fourth quarters.

In contrast, Round Mountain (NV) has had a much more successful campaign, posting a record of 14-8 with a perfect 6-0 in league play. Their dominance at home (8-1) and away (4-3) combined with a strong neutral record (2-4) highlights their ability to perform under various conditions. Round Mountain averages 42.5 points per game, with impressive scoring in the final quarter (12.8 points). This ability to finish strong sets them apart from their opponents.

Scoring and Statistical Averages:

• Beaver Dam averages 30.7 points per game, while Round Mountain leads with 42.3 points per game, illustrating a key offensive disparity.
• In terms of rebounds, Round Mountain averages 28.9 per game, while Beaver Dam does not report a rebounding average.
• Round Mountain also edges out Beaver Dam in assists (5.5), steals (14.8), and blocks (3.8), showing superior overall efficiency on both ends of the court.

Top Performers:

• Beaver Dam’s standout player, #11 Crissy Medina, leads the team with 12.9 points per game. Despite this, Beaver Dam’s overall performance has not been enough to secure a winning record.
• For Round Mountain, #23 Ava Faga has been a powerhouse, leading with 14.9 points per game. Ava also excels in rebounds, with 10.1 per game, alongside solid contributions in assists (1.4), steals (3.5), and blocks (1.8).

Head-to-Head Performance:

Beaver Dam and Round Mountain have faced common opponents, but their results diverge sharply. In their matchups, Beaver Dam has a record of 2-6 against common foes, while Round Mountain has dominated with a 10-3 record. This stark difference further emphasizes the challenges Beaver Dam has faced in comparison to Round Mountain’s success.

For example, when both teams faced Indian Springs, Beaver Dam lost 34-22 and won 36-31, while Round Mountain won 51-31 and 47-35, showing their ability to consistently outperform similar opposition.

Record Breakdown:

• Beaver Dam: Overall, their record stands at 11-12, with a solid 4-2 in regional play but a tough non-league performance at 2-5.
• Round Mountain: A more favorable overall record of 14-8, with a perfect 6-0 in league play, stands in contrast to their struggles in non-league games (2-1).

Additionally, Round Mountain has performed better both at home and away, with their only neutral court losses occurring in early season matchups.

Final Thoughts:

While Beaver Dam shows flashes of potential, particularly with standout performances from players like Crissy Medina, their consistency remains an issue. On the other hand, Round Mountain’s ability to finish strong in games and their solid all-around play make them a tough contender in their league. With the remaining season ahead, the two teams will continue to face challenges, but it is clear that Round Mountain has the upper hand in both record and statistical performance.